What NOT to do: Lesson 11...Bash former Client

So I’m pretty sure that everyone has heard of the infamous “Octomom.” You know, the lady who recently had eight kids to add on to the six she already had. Well her real name is Nadya Suleman. And it seems like she’s having a difficult time keeping a publicist. For the second time in less than a month Suleman is down a publicist.

The first PR firm stepped down after receiving threats of violence and even death. Now less than a month later, Suleman’s second publicist, Victor Munoz says he’s done. “This woman is nuts," he told Usmagazine.com. "This I can say: What ultimately destroyed the business arrangement was personal reasons."

With the release of this statement, Munoz is not doing himself any favors professionally by publicly bashing a former client. Who would want to hire him after criticizing someone he used to represent? As a publicist, Munoz should have known better.

What do you think about Munoz’s statement about “Octomom?”

-Travis Francis

What NOT to do: Lesson 10... Disclose Information

When Amazon's new wireless reading device, the Kindle 2, was released last week, it was the first time many publishers heard about the feature. Amazon chose to keep the text-to-speech feature built into the Kindle 2 a secret from much of the publishing sector.

Following the debut of the Kindle 2, the 9,000-member Authors Guild claimed text-to-speech created a derivative work and violated copyright. Paul Aiken, the guild's president, said many publishers were also angered over the speech function, adding that Amazon never consulted beforehand with either of those groups. Amazon responded on Friday by giving publishers the ability to disable the text-to-speech feature on any title they choose.

What Amazon should have done was discuss the feature ahead of time. If that would have taken place, none of this would have happened. Instead it appears Amazon was basically saying, “We’re Amazon, we can do what we want!”

My question is, as a PR professional for Amazon, what do you think they should have done?

- Travis Francis

What NOT to do: Lesson 9...No Communication

Since last Tuesday, there has been uproar among Facebook members. Out of the blue, Facebook secretly changed its terms of services. The new rules of Facebook basically says that they would own the content people posted on the site, even personal information after the person closed out their account.

And by the next morning, users who logged into their account receivied a posting that said that the site was going back to its previous terms of use policies while it resolves the issues.

Facebook’s founder, Mark Zuckerberg, then created a group called "Facebook Bill of Rights and Responsibilities." The group’s main focus was to inform users that Facebook "doesn't claim rights to any of your photos or other content. We need a license in order to help you share information with your friends, but we don't claim to own your information."

What should Facebook have done? If I were a member of Facebook’s PR department, I’d make sure that a public statement was issued about the changes to the terms of services. If they were going to change things, why do it in secrecy?

-Travis Francis

What NOT to do: Lesson 8... Be racist

Before I even begin, I want everyone to know that this post is less of a "What NOT to do in PR" and more of a "I'm completely outraged."

On Wednesday, February 18, 2009, I was on my way back to work. I had the radio up, listening to the Michael Baisden show on 96.1 JAMZ. The major subject of the show (the reason Baisden showed up to work, even though he was ill) was the editorial cartoon that appeared in the New York Post on the same day. If you're unfamiliar with the cartoon I am referring to, simply Google "NY Post cartoon" and the image will be the first result.

The cartoon is of two police officers standing over a monkey who has been shot to death. The officer's gun is smoking and the monkey is lying in a pool of its own blood, with two visible bullet holes . The cartoon reads "They'll have to find someone else to write the next stimulus bill."

Really? It's 2009, we have a black president and one of the world's leading newspapers allows its editorial cartoonist to publish racist material. What's worse is that the New York Post is defending the cartoon, saying "the cartoon is a clear parody of a current news event," (referring to the Connecticut woman who was recently mauled by a Chimpanzee).

Talk about bad publicity. The New York Post should have IMMEDIATELY issued an apology and the cartoonist should go draw somewhere else. I expect so much more from such a prominent newspaper.

-Gearey McLeod

What NOT to do: Lesson 7... Be creative, but don't cross the line

Last week I was surfing the Internet and came across a headline on Yahoo! that said Microsoft chairman, Bill Gates, opened a jar and unleashed a swarm of mosquitoes on the audience at the Technology, Entertainment, Design (TED) Conference.

Gates released the mosquitoes to make a demonstration about malaria, a disease carried in mosquitoes. When I first read it, I thought Bill Gates had lost his mind. I thought to myself, "it's just cruel to release mosquitoes on people."

In the article on Yahoo! News, it was reported that Gates began to open a the jar full of mosquitoes and said, "Malaria is spread by mosquitoes. I brought some. Here I'll let them roam around. There is no reason only poor people should be infected."

Luckily for him and the audience, the mosquitoes were malaria-free. Gates has been known for his philanthropy, one of the latest is finding a cure for malaria. I understand what he was attempting to do, but mosquitoes are still pests. If they get a chance to suck your blood like the flying vampires they are, you'll get an itch and a bump wherever the mosquito decided to drink blood from your body.

As a PR professional, I'd definitely tell Bill to not do that. There are ways to make a demonstration without putting people's lives in danger. I don't care how much money one has, it is absolutely cruel to release mosquitoes, or any bug, on an audience. That demonstration has now gone overboard. What would you advise Gates to do?

-Marlon Williams

What NOT to do: Lesson 6…Spin the Truth

When reports came in that Chris Brown would not be attending the last Sunday’s Grammy’s because of a LAPD investigation for felony battery, the media automatically zoned in on his girlfriend Rihanna. Members of the media then contacted Rihanna’s publicist, Amanda Silverman, to gain information on the explosive accusations that Brown laid hands on Rihanna.

Silverman stated that her client was involved in a traffic accident and was "fine." She then released another statement stating that the R&B singer was "well. Thank you for your concern and support." It was later reported that Rihanna was being tended to at Los Angeles’ Cedar-Sinai Medical Center with injuries that reflected a domestic abuse assault.

Fabricating stories isn’t new to Silverman, she’s been caught by the media before. Creating stories about high-profile clients Daman Dash and Naomi Campbell has given her a bad name with the press. As Page Six puts it, “If Silverman says the sun is shining, bring an umbrella.”

The media is known for calling out publicists for lying, that’s the last thing you want to do because then you’ll become the story and be crucified for it. What Silverman should have done was think before she spoke. No matter what, don't lie about the situation. If anything, a simple “No Comment” would have done the job. Lying is the one sin the media will neither tolerate nor forgive.

- Travis Francis

What NOT to do: Lesson 5...Deny the Holocaust

British Bishop Richard Williamson is at the center of controversy after being brought back into the Catholic Church. The reason for the rift….? Williamson said he did not believe any Jews were gassed during the Holocaust. He insulted the memory of the 6 million Jews murdered in Nazi death camps by stating that only 200,000 were killed.

Jewish groups and Roman Catholic bishops in Pope Benedict XVI native Germany demanded that Williamson apologize for his statements before he could be admitted as a bishop into the Roman Catholic Church. But instead, Williamson said that he needed “proof” that the Holocaust actually happened. What more proof does he need?

The Vatican practically did nothing to ease the PR damage done by the decision of Pope Benedict XVI to bring Williamson back to the church. Williamson has never apologized for his ridiculous views about the extent of Jewish suffering under the Nazis. If Williamson has yet to retract his outrageous statements regarding the treatment of the Jewish people during the days of Adolf Hitler, he should not be a registered member of the Church, much less a Bishop. As the PR Practitioner for the Vatican, I would not only excommunicate Williamson from the church but also issue an apology to the Jewish community.

-Travis Francis